STF4SW Interactive demo · draft
Feel the difference

Same earthquake. Two buildings.

Both towers below sit on the same ground motion. The left one is unprotected; the right one carries an STF damper that stiffens the instant the shaking turns violent. Raise the intensity and watch the gap grow.

Without damper
0.0
peak roof drift (cm) · 0.0 now
With STF damper
0.0
peak roof drift (cm) · 0.0 now
reduction in peak roof drift with the STF damper
0.50 g
6.0×
STF damper · live hysteresis

The force–displacement loop, as it forms.

While the protected tower sways, its damper traces a force–displacement loop in real time. The area enclosed is the energy the fluid absorbs each cycle — the fatter and more tilted the loop, the more the viscosity has thickened. It follows the constitutive model the consortium implemented in WP2:

Force–velocity (constitutive curve) · live point
Fd = Kgeom · η(γ̇) · V
η(γ̇) = η0 + ηmax · S(γ̇)shear-thickening
γ̇ = ε̇ · l ⁄ h∝ |V|
η(γ̇) / η₀1.0×
shear rate γ̇0.00
energy / loop0
Phenomenological STF damper model, Wei et al. (2019); implemented in ATENA by Červenka Consulting (STF4SW WP2.4, Istanbul meeting 2026). Illustrative scaling.

Soft when the city sleeps

Under everyday vibration the shear-thickening fluid flows freely, so the damper barely interferes with the structure.

Solid when the ground moves

As the shear rate spikes during an earthquake, the fluid jams into a near-solid state, soaking up energy and cutting the building's sway.

Illustrative single-degree-of-freedom model with a synthetic ground motion, built to convey the concept, not to report engineering results. The damper is modelled as velocity-thickening damping. Real characterization data and the seismic-analysis tools live on the project's Dissemination page.